Despite AI Buzz, Search Engines Are Still King for Travel Planning

For a daily briefing on the most important data, charts and insights from Morning Consult,sign up for Our Best Intel.

Travelinspiration can come from anywhere, even a streaming series or a social media reel. But once travelers have a destination in mind, the real work begins: searching and booking. These steps are where the bulk of the travel path to purchase happens, and they take a lot of effort from consumers to accomplish. The launch of ChatGPT drew speculation in early 2023 that generative AI would help lessen the burden for travelers by simplifying the purchase journey. But despite the early excitement, travelers have yet to fully embrace this new technology, opting instead to continue to take the reins themselves.

Price-conscious travelers prefer to shop around for the best value

旅行者想要控制珀切斯的一个原因e journey is so they can make sure they’re getting the most for their money. Inflation may have cooled since last summer, but when it comes to travel, price still takes precedence.

特别是预订住宿and transportation. The top reasons travelers choose to use a particular platform to book these aspects of travel are all cost-centric, like ensuring they’re getting the best value for their money, finding the cheapest option or avoiding hidden fees. Trust in the platform is the one non-price-related driver at the top of the list, thoughtrust is connectedwith consumers’ overall perception of value. Notably, finding options that are affordable and offer good value are also the elements of booking travel that consumers find the most challenging.

Early buzz around ChatGPT suggested that it might help ease these challenges for travelers, with many hypothesizing that generative AI tools would upend the travel search process and help connect would-be travelers to their ideal itinerary without all the extra effort. However, at this point, consumers are still turning to basic internet queries more often than advanced tools when searching for travel options.

In fact, of the various search methods surveyed, generative AI tools like ChatGPT fell toward the bottom of the list of resources travelers use most frequently. However, as these tools are further integrated into search engines as a default rather than an opt-in feature, their influence stands to grow, albeit driven by tech companies rather than by consumer demand.

与此同时,运输和好客brands still have a great deal of competition when it comes to driving would-be travelers directly to their sites — and this is especially true for the ever-important millennial generation. When searching for transportation options, millennials are more likely to turn to four other tools over a travel brand’s website or app. This ranking is low compared with other generations’: Gen Xers prefer three other sources, and for Gen Zers and baby boomers, brand websites and apps are only bested by search engines.

Travelers cast the widest net when searching for hotel accommodations

Consumers may consider brand loyalties when planning travel, but that doesn’t mean they won’t keep their options open. When searching for transportation and accommodations, they’re more likely to visit multiple sites than to stick to one.

The difference is smallest when consumers are booking train or bus tickets and when they’re reserving a vacation rental — they’re 3 and 7 points more likely, respectively, to use multiple sites than just one in those instances. These slight gaps are likely due to the smaller pool of major brands in these categories. But the difference grows when consumers search for airfare and hotels. Consumers are 12 points more likely to consult multiple sources when searching for a flight and 20 points more likely when booking a hotel.

How many sources, sites or apps do travelers typically consult? The average is somewhere between two and three. But both the average number of sites, as well as the maximum number reported, vary by what aspect of the trip a traveler is booking. When it comes to airfare, consumers visit an average of 2.56 sites, and the maximum mentioned was 10. For hotels, though, the average was 2.86, and the maximum was 20. Vacation rentals command the most loyalty with an average of 2.27 sites visited, although the maximum number quoted was 11.

For each of these categories, frequent travelers are apt to visit more sites or brands than casual travelers — perhaps surprising, as their engagement with the travel industry may suggest higher brand loyalty.

Most travelers still prefer direct booking

While travelers do their due diligence when searching for trip options, a plurality still prefer to book directly with the travel company on their website. For many, this is likely due to the transparency of price and the terms of the booking — the frustrations of rescheduling or canceling plans due to the COVID-19 pandemic still weigh heavily on travelers’ memories, and having a direct line to the company when trips need to be adjusted is thought to smooth the process.

That said, many travelers are also open to booking on third-party websites, suggesting that while direct booking has the edge, brands can do more to entice consumers away from online travel agencies.

Travelers also show a clear preference for websites over mobile apps when it comes to booking, despite favoring their mobile devices during the search process. Both direct and third-party websites outranked their app-based counterparts in terms of booking preference for both transportation and accommodations. This transition suggests that travel brands should focus app functionality on searching for and comparing travel options, while optimizing websites for booking.

Ultimately, while the path to purchase is highly variable, consumer preferences suggest that they want to retain a sense of control over their travel search and booking activities. While ChatGPT and other generative AI tools show early promise, in order to truly disrupt the path to purchase, they’ll need to command the trust of consumers who are used to doing all of the work themselves.