Nearly Half of the Public Opposes Texas Judge’s Decision to Overturn FDA’s Approval of Abortion Pill

For our latest global health care data and analysis,sign up for our daily health news briefing

A ruling by a federal judge in Texas tosuspendthe Food and Drug Administration's approval of the abortion pill mifepristone is opposed by nearly half the public, according to a new Morning Consultsurvey.

3 in 5 Democrats oppose the Texas judge’s abortion pill ruling

• While 47% of U.S. adults oppose U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk’s decision, 29% said they support the ruling and 24% said they do not know or have no opinion. The results are in line with a Marchsurveyconducted before the ruling was issued.
• Among Democrats, 3 in 5 said they oppose the suspension of FDA approval for mifepristone, and roughly 1 in 4 said they support the decision. Republicans were more likely to support (43%) than oppose (33%) the suspension.
• Among all U.S. adults, 3 in 5 said they support medication abortion access to people in their state, including 77% of Democrats, 52% of independents and 42% of Republicans. However, just 3 in 10 adults said they have a “very” or “somewhat” favorable view of mifepristone, while about half (46%) said they have never heard of the drug.

Nearly 2 in 5 Republicans say the Texas judge’s decision was within his jurisdiction

• Among all U.S. adults, roughly 2 in 5 said Kacsmaryk’s suspension of the FDA’s approval of mifepristone was outside of his jurisdiction, compared with about 1 in 4 who said the decision was within his jurisdiction and roughly 1 in 3 who said they did not know or had no opinion.
• 近3 5民主党人说,法官在外面of his jurisdiction, while about 2 in 5 Republicans said the ruling was within his jurisdiction. Among independents, about 1 in 3 said the ruling was outside of the judge’s jurisdiction, while 1 in 5 said it was within and nearly half said they did not know or had no opinion.
• Nearly half of U.S. adults (47%) said they had seen, read or heard “a lot” or “some” about Kacsmaryk’s ruling, with Democrats (58%) more likely to have heard of the decision than Republicans (40%) or independents (37%).

Access to medication abortion remains in question

The fate of themost common method of abortionwill likely be in question for the foreseeable future after Kacsmaryk’s unprecedented ruling that overturned the FDA’s 23-year-old approval of the medication. Shortly after the decision, a Washington judge ordered the FDA to continue to offer the drug in Washington, D.C., and 17 states, which issued a lawsuit to maintain the status quo.

The U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals temporarilyupheld the FDA’s approvalfollowing the Justice Department’s appeal. However, the mostly conservative court did not overturn Kacsmaryk’s block of other measures that increased access to the medication.

Patients, providers and manufacturers will likely have to wait for another landmark abortion ruling from the Supreme Court for clarity on the issue, as the Justice Departmentwill requestthe court to step in.

2023年4月10号至13号,,surveywas conducted among a representative sample of 2,209 U.S. adults, with an unweighted margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points.